How Was The First Person In Animal Alive

One of Pavlov's dogs with a saliva-catch container and tube surgically implanted in its muzzle, Pavlov Museum, 2005

The history of animate being testing goes dorsum to the writings of the Ancient Greeks in the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE, with Aristotle (384–322 BCE) and Erasistratus (304–258 BCE) one of the first documented to perform experiments on nonhuman animals.^[1] Galen, a physician in 2nd-century Rome, dissected pigs and goats, and is known equally the "Begetter of Vivisection."^[2] Avenzoar, an Arabic doc in twelfth-century Moorish Kingdom of spain who also practiced dissection, introduced animal testing as an experimental method of testing surgical procedures before applying them to human patients.^{[3] [four]} Although the exact purpose of the process was unclear, a Neolithic surgeon performed trepanation on a moo-cow in 3400-3000 BCE.^[5] This is the earliest known surgery to have been performed on an beast, and information technology is possible that the procedure was washed on a dead moo-cow in order for the surgeon to practice their skills.

History of animal testing [edit]

The mouse is a typical testing species.

In 1242, Ibn al-Nafis provided accurate descriptions of the apportionment of blood in mammals. A complete description of this circulation was later provided in the 17th century by William Harvey.

In his unfinished 1627 utopian novel, New Atlantis, scientist and philosopher Francis Bacon proposed a inquiry center containing "parks and enclosures of all sorts of beasts and birds which we apply ... for dissections and trials; that thereby we may accept light what may be wrought upon the body of man."

In the 1660s, the physicist Robert Boyle conducted many experiments with a pump to investigate the effects of rarefied air. He listed two experiments on living nonhuman animals: "Experiment 40", which tested the ability of insects to wing nether reduced air force per unit area, and the dramatic "Experiment 41," which demonstrated the reliance of living creatures on the air for their survival. Boyle conducted numerous trials during which he placed a big diversity of different nonhuman animals, including birds, mice, eels, snails and flies, in the vessel of the pump and studied their reactions as the air was removed.^[half-dozen] Hither, he describes an injured lark:

…the Bird for a while appear'd lively enough; but upon a greater Exsuction of the Air, she began manifestly to droop and appear sick, and very soon after was taken with as trigger-happy and irregular Convulsions, equally are wont to be observ'd in Poultry, when their heads are wrung off: For the Bird threw her cocky over and over 2 or three times, and dyed with her Breast up, her Head downwards, and her Neck awry.^[vii]

In the 18th century, Antoine Lavoisier decided to utilise a guinea hog in a calorimeter considering he wanted to prove that respiration was a form of combustion. He had an impression that combustion and respiration are chemically identical. Lavoisier demonstrated this with the help of Pierre-Simon Laplace. They both carefully measured the amount of "carbon dioxide and estrus given off by a republic of guinea pig as (they) breathed".^[8] So they contrasted this to "the amount of heat produced when they burned carbon to produce the same corporeality of carbon dioxide as had been exhaled by the republic of guinea sus scrofa".^[viii] Their conclusion fabricated Lavoisier confident "that respiration is a class of combustion".^[8] Also, the result showed that the oestrus mammals produce through respiration allowed their bodies to be to a higher place room temperature.

Stephen Hales measured blood pressure in the equus caballus. In the 1780s, Luigi Galvani demonstrated that electricity practical to a expressionless, dissected, frog's leg muscle acquired it to twitch, which led to an appreciation for the relationship between electricity and animation. In the 1880s, Louis Pasteur convincingly demonstrated the germ theory of medicine by giving anthrax to sheep. In the 1890s, Ivan Pavlov famously used dogs to depict classical conditioning.

In 1921 Otto Loewi provided the first substantial prove that neuronal communication with target cells occurred via chemical synapses. He extracted ii hearts from frogs and left them beating in an ionic bathroom. He stimulated the fastened Vagus nerve of the first heart and observed its chirapsia slowed. When the second heart was placed in the ionic bath of the first, it besides slowed.^[ix]

In the 1920s, Edgar Adrian formulated the theory of neural communication that the frequency of action potentials, and not the size of the action potentials, was the footing for communicating the magnitude of the signal. His piece of work was performed in an isolated frog nerve-muscle preparation. Adrian was awarded a Nobel Prize for his piece of work.^[10]

In the 1960s David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel demonstrated the macro columnar arrangement of visual areas in cats and monkeys, and provided physiological bear witness for the critical catamenia for the development of disparity sensitivity in vision (i.e.: the chief cue for depth perception), and were awarded a Nobel Prize for their work.

In 1996 Dolly the sheep was born, the start mammal to exist cloned from an adult cell.^[xi] The process past which Dolly the sheep was cloned utilized a process known as nuclear transfer practical by lead scientist Ian Wilmut. Although other scientists were non immediately able to replicate the experiment, Wilmut argued that the experiment was indeed repeatable, given a timeframe of over a yr.^[12]

In 1997, innovations in frogs, Xenopus laevis, by developmental biologist Jonathan Slack of the Academy of Bathroom, created headless tadpoles, which could allow future applications in donor organ transplantation.^[13]

There has been growing concern about both the methodology and the intendance of animals in laboratories who are used in testing. There is increasing emphasis on more humane and compassionate treatment of other animals.^[fourteen] Methodological concerns include factors that make creature study results less reproducible than intended. For case, a 2014 study from McGill University in Montreal, Canada suggests that mice handled past men rather than women showed college stress levels.^{[15] [xvi] [17]}

In medicine [edit]

Early depictions of vivisection using pigs

In the 1880s and 1890s, Emil von Behring isolated the diphtheria toxin and demonstrated its effects in guinea pigs. He went on to demonstrate immunity against diphtheria in other animals in 1898 by injecting a mix of toxin and antidote. This piece of work constituted in office the rationale for awarding von Behring the 1901 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Roughly 15 years later, Behring appear such a mix suitable for human immunity which largely banished diphtheria from the scourges of humankind.^[xviii] The antidote is famously commemorated each yr in the Iditarod race, which is modeled after the Nome in the 1925 serum run to Nome. The success of the animal studies in producing the diphtheria antitoxin are attributed by some as a cause of the decline of the early 20th century antivivisectionist move in the USA.^[19]

In 1921, Frederick Banting tied up the pancreatic ducts of dogs and discovered that the isolates of pancreatic secretion could be used to proceed dogs with diabetes live. He followed up these experiments with the chemical isolation of insulin in 1922 with John Macleod. These experiments used bovine sources instead of dogs to improve the supply. The first person treated was Leonard Thompson, a xiv-year-sometime diabetic who only weighed 65 pounds and was nearly to slip into a blackout and die. After the offset dose, the conception had to exist re-worked, a process that took 12 days. The second dose was effective.^[20] These two won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1923 for their discovery of insulin and its treatment of diabetes mellitus. Thompson lived 13 more years taking insulin. Earlier insulin's clinical use, a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus meant death; Thompson had been diagnosed in 1919.^[21]

In 1943, Selman Waksman's laboratory discovered streptomycin using a series of screens to find antibacterial substances from the soil. Waksman coined the term antibiotic with regards to these substances. Waksman would win the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1952 for his discoveries in antibiotics. Corwin Hinshaw and William Feldman took the streptomycin samples and cured tuberculosis in four guinea pigs with it. Hinshaw followed these studies with homo trials that provided a dramatic advance in the power to cease and reverse the progression of tuberculosis.^{[22] [23]} Mortality from tuberculosis in the UK has diminished from the early on 20th century due to amend hygiene and improved living standards, just from the moment antibiotics were introduced, the fall became steep so that by the 1980s mortality in developed countries was effectively zero.^[24]

In the 1940s, Jonas Salk used rhesus monkey cross-contamination studies to isolate the three forms of the polio virus that affected hundreds of thousands yearly.^[25] Salk's team created a vaccine against the strains of polio in cell cultures of rhesus monkey kidney cells. The vaccine was made publicly available in 1955 and reduced the incidence of polio fifteen-fold in the U.s.a. over the following v years.^[26] Albert Sabin made a superior "alive" vaccine by passing the polio virus through animate being hosts, including monkeys. The vaccine was produced for mass consumption in 1963 and is still in use today. It had virtually eradicated polio in the United states by 1965.^[27] It has been estimated that 100,000 rhesus monkeys were killed in the course of developing the polio vaccines, and 65 doses of vaccine were produced from each monkey. Writing in the Winston-Salem Journal in 1992, Sabin said, "Without the employ of nonhuman animals and man (animals), it would have been impossible to larn the of import knowledge needed to foreclose much suffering and premature decease not only amid humans but (other) animals also."^[28]

Too in the 1940s, John Cade tested lithium salts in guinea pigs in a search for pharmaceuticals with anticonvulsant properties. The nonhuman animals seemed calmer in their mood. He and then tested lithium on himself, earlier using it to treat recurrent mania.^[29] The introduction of lithium revolutionized the treatment of manic-depressives past the 1970s. Prior to Cade's animal testing, manic-depressives were treated with a lobotomy or electro-convulsive therapy.

In the 1950s the first safer, volatile anaesthetic halothane was adult through studies on rodents, rabbits, dogs, cats and monkeys.^[thirty] This paved the manner for a whole new generation of modernistic full general anaesthetics – also developed by animal studies – without which mod, complex surgical operations would be near impossible.^[31]

In 1960, Albert Starr pioneered eye valve replacement surgery in humans later on a series of surgical advances in dogs.^[32] He received the Lasker Medical Award in 2007 for his efforts, forth with Alain Carpentier. In 1968 Carpentier fabricated heart valve replacements from the heart valves of pigs, which are pre-treated with glutaraldehyd to blunt immune response. Over 300,000 people receive heart valve replacements derived from Starr and Carpentier's designs annually. Carpentier said of Starr'due south initial advances "Before his prosthetic, patients with valvular disease would die."^[33]

In the 1970s, leprosy multi-drug antibiotic treatments were refined using leprosy leaner grown in armadillos and were then tested in man clinical trials. Today, the nine-banded armadillo is still used to culture the bacteria that causes leprosy, for studies of the proteomics and genomics (the genome was completed in 1998) of the bacteria, for improving therapy and developing vaccines. Leprosy is nevertheless prevalent in Brazil, Republic of madagascar, Mozambique, Tanzania, India, and Nepal, with over 400,000 cases at the beginning of 2004.^[34] The bacteria has not even so been cultured in vitro with success necessary to develop drug treatments or vaccines, and mice and armadillos have been the sources of the bacteria for research.^[35]

The non-human primate models of AIDS, using HIV-2, SHIV, and SIV in macaques, take been used every bit a complement to ongoing inquiry efforts against the virus. The drug tenofovir has had its efficacy and toxicology evaluated in macaques and plant long-term/high-dose treatments had adverse effects not found using short-term/high-dose treatment followed past long-term/depression-dose handling. This finding in macaques was translated into human dosing regimens. Rubber treatment with anti-virals has been evaluated in macaques considering an introduction of the virus tin only be controlled in an animal model. The finding that prophylaxis can be constructive at blocking infection has altered the treatment for occupational exposures, such as needle exposures. Such exposures are now followed rapidly with anti-HIV drugs, and this practice has resulted in measurable transient virus infection similar to the NHP model. Similarly, the mother-to-fetus transmission, and its fetal prophylaxis with antivirals such as tenofovir and AZT, has been evaluated in controlled testing in macaques not possible in humans, and this knowledge has guided antiviral treatment in pregnant mothers with HIV. "The comparison and correlation of results obtained in monkey and human studies are leading to a growing validation and recognition of the relevance of the animal model. Although each animal model has its limitations, advisedly designed drug studies in nonhuman primates can go on to advance our scientific knowledge and guide futurity clinical trials."^{[36] [37] [38]}

Throughout the 20th century, research that used live nonhuman animals has led to many other medical advances and treatments for homo diseases, such as: organ transplant techniques and anti-transplant rejection medications,^{[39] [40] [41] [42]} the heart-lung machine,^[43] antibiotics like penicillin,^[44] and whooping cough vaccine.^[45]

Presently, brute experimentation continues to be used in research that aims to solve medical problems including Alzheimer's disease,^[46] multiple sclerosis^[47] spinal cord injury,^[48] and many more conditions in which there is no useful in vitro model system available.

Veterinary advances [edit]

A veterinary surgeon at work with a cat

Creature testing for veterinarian studies accounts for around v pct of inquiry using other animals. Treatments to each of the following creature diseases have been derived from creature studies: rabies,^[49] anthrax,^[49] glanders,^[49] Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV),^[50] tuberculosis,^[49] Texas cattle fever,^[49] Classical swine fever (hog cholera),^[49] Heartworm and other parasitic infections.^[51]

Testing other animals for rabies exercise require the animal to be expressionless, and it takes two hours to carry the test.^[52]

Basic and applied enquiry in veterinary medicine continues in varied topics, such every bit searching for improved treatments and vaccines for feline leukemia virus and improving veterinary oncology.

Early argue [edit]

The ethical implications of using animals for testing has been a heated contend in regards to the humane handling that is used.

In 1655, physiologist Edmund O'Meara was recorded as saying that "the miserable torture of vivisection places the body in an unnatural state."^{[53] [54]} O'Meara thus expressed one of the chief scientific objections to vivisection: that the hurting that the individual endured would interfere with the accurateness of the results.

In 1822, the commencement fauna protection law was enacted in the British parliament, followed by the Cruelty to Animals Act (1876), the offset law specifically aimed at regulating animal testing. The legislation was promoted by Charles Darwin, who wrote to Ray Lankester in March 1871:

You lot inquire about my opinion on vivisection. I quite concur that it is justifiable for real investigations on physiology; only not for mere damnable and detestable curiosity. It is a subject field which makes me sick with horror, so I will not say another word virtually it, else I shall non slumber to-night."^{[55] [56]}

Opposition to the use of nonhuman animals in medical enquiry arose in the U.s. during the 1860s, when Henry Bergh founded the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), with America's first specifically anti-vivisection organization being the American AntiVivisection Lodge (AAVS), founded in 1883.

In the UK, an article in the Medical Times and Gazette on April 28, 1877, indicates that anti-vivisectionist campaigners, mainly clergymen, had prepared a number of posters entitled, "This is vivisection," "This is a living domestic dog," and "This is a living rabbit," depicting nonhuman animals in a poses that they said copied the piece of work of Elias von Cyon in St. Petersburg, though the commodity says the images differ from the originals. Information technology states that no more than than ten or a dozen men were actively involved in animal testing on living nonhuman animals in the UK at that time.^[57]

Antivivisectionists of the era believed the spread of mercy was the great cause of civilization, and vivisection was brutal. Withal, in the U.S., the antivivisectionists' efforts were defeated in every legislature considering of the widespread support of an informed public for the careful and judicious use of other animals. The early antivivisectionist move in the U.Due south. dwindled profoundly in the 1920s. Overall, this move had no US legislative success. The passing of the Laboratory Creature Welfare Act, in 1999 was more than focused on protecting the welfare of other animals who are used in all fields, including research, food product, consumer production evolution, etc.^{[58] [59]}

On the other side of the debate, those in favor of nonhuman-animal testing held that experiments on other animals were necessary to accelerate medical and biological cognition and to ensure the condom of products intended for human and brute apply. In 1831, the founders of the Dublin Zoo—the 4th oldest zoo in Europe, after Vienna, Paris, and London—were members of the medical profession, interested in studying the individuals both while they were alive and when they were expressionless.^[60] Claude Bernard, known as the "prince of vivisectors"^[61] and the begetter of physiology—whose married woman, Marie Françoise Martin, founded the beginning anti-vivisection society in France in 1883^[62]—famously wrote in 1865 that "the science of life is a superb and dazzlingly lighted hall which may be reached only by passing through a long and ghastly kitchen."^[63] Arguing that "experiments on (nonhuman) animals...are entirely conclusive for the toxicology and hygiene of man...the furnishings of these substances are the same on man equally on (other) animals, save for differences in degree,"^[64] Bernard established animal experimentation as part of the standard scientific method.^[65] In 1896, the physiologist and physician Dr. Walter B. Cannon said "The antivivisectionists are the second of the two types Theodore Roosevelt described when he said, 'Common sense without conscience may pb to offense, but conscience without mutual sense may lead to folly, which is the handmaiden of law-breaking.'"^[58] These divisions betwixt pro- and anti- animal testing groups start came to public attention during the brown canis familiaris affair in the early on 20th century, when hundreds of medical students clashed with anti-vivisectionists and police over a memorial to a vivisected canis familiaris.^[66]

Come across also [edit]

• History of model organisms
• Animal testing
• Alarik Frithiof Holmgren

Notes [edit]

1. ^ Cohen and Loew 1984.
2. ^ "History of nonhuman animal inquiry" Archived 2006-10-13 at the Wayback Machine, Laboratory Primate Advocacy Group.
3. ^ Abdel-Halim, Rabie East. (September 2005). "Contributions of Ibn Zuhr (Avenzoar) to the progress of surgery: a report and translations from his book Al-Taisir". Saudi Med J. 26 (nine): 1333–nine. PMID 16155644.
4. ^ Abdel-Halim, Rabie Eastward. (2006). "Contributions of Muhadhdhab Al-Deen Al-Baghdadi to the progress of medicine and urology". Saudi Medical Journal. 27 (11): 161–1641. PMID 17106533.
5. ^ Ramirez Rozzi, Fernando; Froment, Alain (2018-04-xix). "Primeval Fauna Cranial Surgery: from Cow to Human in the Neolithic". Scientific Reports. 8 (i): 5536. Bibcode:2018NatSR...8.5536R. doi:ten.1038/s41598-018-23914-1. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC5908843. PMID 29674628.
6. ^ W, J.B. (2005). "Robert Boyle'south landmark volume of 1660 with the first experiments on rarified air". Journal of Practical Physiology. 98 (1): 31–39. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00759.2004. PMID 15591301.
7. ^ Boyle, Robert (2003) [1744]. Works of the Honorable Robert Boyle. Kessinger Publishing. p. 740. ISBN978-0-7661-6865-vii.
8. ^ ^{a b c} "Antoine Lavoisier – Biography, Facts and Pictures". www.famousscientists.org . Retrieved 2016-08-07 .
9. ^ [i] ^{[ expressionless link ]} O. Loewi (1921) "Uber humorale Ubertragbarkeit der Herznervenwirkung. I." Pflügers Archiv, 189, pp. 239-242
10. ^ [two] Adrian Nobel Prize
11. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-06-07. Retrieved 2012-11-21 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy equally championship (link), AnimalResearch.Info Dolly the Sheep
12. ^ "Dolly the Sheep Was a Clone, Edinburgh Scientist Maintains". BMJ: British Medical Periodical. 316 (7131): 573. 1998. JSTOR 25178321.
13. ^ Morton, Oliver; Williams, Nigel (1997). "First Dolly, At present Headless Tadpoles". Scientific discipline. 278 (5339): 798. doi:10.1126/scientific discipline.278.5339.798. JSTOR 2894431. PMID 9381189. S2CID 23144947.
14. ^ Mcmillan, Franklin D. (2012). "What Lexicon Are Creature Researchers Using?". Journal of Fauna Ethics. 2 (1): 1–5. doi:10.5406/janimalethics.2.1.0001. JSTOR ten.5406/janimalethics.2.one.0001.
15. ^ "The earth'southward favourite lab fauna has been institute wanting, just there are new twists in the mouse's tale". The Economist. 2016-12-24. Retrieved 2017-01-x .
16. ^ Katsnelson, Alla (2014). "Male researchers stress out rodents". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.15106. S2CID 87534627.
17. ^ "Male Scent May Compromise Biomedical Research". Science | AAAS. 2014-04-28. Retrieved 2017-01-x .
18. ^ "Emil von Behring – Biographical".
19. ^ Walter B. Cannon Papers, American Philosophical Lodge Archived 2009-08-14 at the Wayback Machine
20. ^ Discovery of Insulin Archived 2009-09-thirty at the Wayback Motorcar
21. ^ "Leonard Thompson Bio Folio". Archived from the original on 2009-02-10.
22. ^ [3] Hinshaw obituary
23. ^ [4] Streptomycin
24. ^ Is Scientific discipline Necessary
    Author: Max Perutz
    Page: 37-41
    Published 1989
    Publisher E.P. Dutton/NAL Penguin Inc
    ISBN 0-525-24673-8
25. ^ [5] Virus-typing of polio by Salk
26. ^ [half dozen] Salk polio virus
27. ^ [7] History of polio vaccine
28. ^ ""the work on [polio] prevention was long delayed by... misleading experimental models of the disease in monkeys" - ari.info".
29. ^ [eight] John Cade and Lithium
30. ^ Raventos J (1956) Br J Pharmacol 11, 394
31. ^ Whalen FX, Bacon DR & Smith HM (2005) All-time Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol nineteen, 323
32. ^ "Portland surgeon receives top medical prize". The Oregonian. 15 September 2007.
33. ^ "2007 Lasker Awards announced – The Scientist Magazine®".
34. ^ "Domicile – spectroscopyNOW.com".
35. ^ "Armadillos in Enquiry".
36. ^ AIDS Reviews 2005;vii:67-83 Antiretroviral Drug Studies in Nonhuman Primates: a Valid Beast Model for Innovative Drug Efficacy and Pathogenesis Experiments Archived 2008-12-17 at the Wayback Machine
37. ^ "PMPA: Experimental Drug That Completely Protects Monkeys Exposed To SIV".
38. ^ "Medical Roundup".
39. ^ Carrel A (1912) Surg. Gynec. Obst. 14: p. 246
40. ^ Williamson C (1926) J. Urol. 16: p. 231
41. ^ Woodruff H & Burg R (1986) in Discoveries in Pharmacology vol iii, ed Parnham & Bruinvels, Elsevier, Amsterdam
42. ^ Moore F (1964) Requite and Take: the Evolution of Tissue Transplantation. Saunders, New York
43. ^ Gibbon JH (1937) Curvation. Surg. 34, 1105
44. ^ Fleming A (1929) Br J Exp Pathol 10, 226
45. ^ Medical Enquiry Council (1956) Br. Med. J. 2: p. 454
46. ^ Geula, C; Wu C-Yard, Saroff D; Lorenzo, A; Yuan, 1000; Yankner, BA; Yankner, Bruce A. (1998). "Aging renders the brain vulnerable to amyloid β protein neurotoxicity". Nature Medicine. 4 (7): 827–31. doi:10.1038/nm0798-827. PMID 9662375. S2CID 45108486.
47. ^ Jameson, BA; McDonnell, JM; Marini, JC; Korngold, R (1994). "A rationally designed CD4 analogue inhibits experimental allergic encephalomyelitis". Nature. 368 (6473): 744–6. Bibcode:1994Natur.368..744J. doi:x.1038/368744a0. PMID 8152486. S2CID 4370797.
48. ^ Lyuksyutova, AL; Lu C-C, Milanesio North; Milanesio, N; Male monarch, LA; Guo, N; Wang, Y; Nathans, J; Tessier-Lavigne, Thousand; et al. (2003). "Inductive-posterior guidance of commissural axons by Wnt-Frizzled signaling". Science. 302 (5652): 1984–8. Bibcode:2003Sci...302.1984L. doi:x.1126/science.1089610. PMID 14671310. S2CID 39309990.
49. ^ ^{a b c d e f} A reference handbook of the medical sciences. William Wood and Co., 1904, Edited by Albert H. Buck.
50. ^ Pu, R; Coleman, J; Coisman, J; Sato, Due east; Tanabe, T; Arai, G; Yamamoto, JK (2005). "Dual-subtype FIV vaccine (Fel-O-Vax FIV) protection against a heterologous subtype B FIV isolate". Periodical of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 7 (1): 65–70. doi:ten.1016/j.jfms.2004.08.005. PMID 15686976. S2CID 26525327.
51. ^ Dryden, MW; Payne, PA (2005). "Preventing parasites in cats". Veterinary Therapeutics : Research in Applied Veterinary Medicine. half-dozen (3): 260–vii. PMID 16299672.
52. ^ "Diagnosis in Animals and Humans". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011-09-20. Retrieved 2016-07-31 .
53. ^ Ryder, Richard D. Animal Revolution: Irresolute Attitudes Towards Speciesism. Berg Publishers, 2000, p. 54.
54. ^ "Animal Experimentation: A Student Guide to Balancing the Issues" Archived 2009-12-eighteen at WebCite, Australian and New Zealand Council for the Intendance of Animals in Inquiry and Education (ANZCCART), retrieved Dec 12, 2007, cites original reference in Maehle, A-H. and Tr6hler, U. 1987. Beast experimentation from antiquity to the cease of the eighteenth century: attitudes and arguments. In Northward. A. Rupke (ed.) Vivisection in Historical Perspective. Croom Helm, London, p. 22
55. ^ The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, Volume 2, fulltextarchive.com.
56. ^ Bowlby, John. Charles Darwin: A New Life, W. W. Norton & Company, 1991. p. 420.
57. ^ The Latest Phase of the Vivisection Question, Medical Times and Gazette, Apr 28, 1877, pp. 446–447.
58. ^ ^{a b} The Physiologist at the-aps.org A Physiologist's Views on the Fauna Rights/Liberation Movement Archived 2008-05-30 at the Wayback Machine by Charles Due south. Nicoll The Physiologist 34(6): December 1991
59. ^ Buettinger, Craig Antivivisection and the accuse of zoophil-psychosis in the early twentieth century. The Historian 1993
60. ^ Costello, John (9 June 2011). "The great zoo's who". Irish Independent.
61. ^ Croce, Pietro. Vivisection or Scientific discipline? An Investigation into Testing Drugs and Safeguarding Wellness. Zed Books, 1999, p. xi.
62. ^ Rudacille, Deborah. The Scalpel and the Butterfly: The Disharmonize, Farrar Straus Giroux, 2000, p. nineteen.
63. ^ "In sickness and in health: vivisection'south undoing", The Daily Telegraph, November 2003.
64. ^ Bernard, Claude An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine, 1865. First English translation by Henry Copley Greene, published by Macmillan & Co., Ltd., 1927; reprinted in 1949, p125
65. ^ LaFollette, H., Shanks, North., Animal Experimentation: the Legacy of Claude Bernard, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science (1994) pp. 195-210.
66. ^ Mason, Peter. The Dark-brown Dog Affair. Two Sevens Publishing, 1997.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_animal_testing

Posted by: taylorthenautist.blogspot.com

Share this post